Tactile Dialogues: Textile Art from 1970s to Now – 触觉对话:20世纪70年代至今的纺织艺术

In the art-market documentary The Price of Everything (2018), Amy Cappellazzo of Sotheby’s suggests positioning works in a corporate atrium as a one-way route to career death. As the auctioneer sees it, once you wind up in the lobby, there’s no getting out. It seems an irresistibly knowing gesture, then, to mount an ambitious show of textile works – a medium, in a less appreciative era, synonymous with lobby art – within the entrance hall and stairwell of a 1960s corporate block.

s17-christoph-hefti.jpg

Tactile Dialogues: Textile Art from 1970s to Now - 触觉对话:20世纪70年代至今的纺织艺术

Christoph Hefti, Animal Mask, 2016, dyed and natural wool and silk. Courtesy: Maniera

In ‘Soft? Tactile Dialogues’, the work of younger Belgian-based artists engaging with fibre – among them the Nel Aerts, Kati Heck and Klaas Rommelaere – are shown alongside allied works from the 1970s. It was a vogueish era for the medium. From 1962, International Tapestry Biennials were held in Lausanne and in 1969 the exhibition ‘Wall Hangings’ at New York’s Museum of Modern Art included works by Sheila Hicks and Lenore Tawney alongside 27 other artists from the Americas and Europe.

This exhibition re-introduces the work of the (largely female) Textielgroep active in Belgium during that era. With the exception of two pieces by Tapta (born Maria Wierusz-Kowalski), all are drawn from the archive of Antwerp’s ModeMuseum, where they have lurked un-shown since shortly after acquisition. (Such are the vagaries of fashion, in art as in costume.)

s03-kh_arco2016_02-1.jpg

Tactile Dialogues: Textile Art from 1970s to Now - 触觉对话:20世纪70年代至今的纺织艺术

Kati Heck, Dreimal Selbst mit Magier (Even with Three Magicians), 2016, oil, pencil, ink and canvas on canvas. Courtesy: © Tim Van Laere Gallery

It seems implausible that any institution could overlook Veerle Dupont’s Alruin (Mandrake, 1976). Besides this wall hanging’s considerable heft and the rooty tendrils that cascade its length like tentacles of the Kraken, the work has an insistent aroma. Among the many materials woven into Alruin’s tufty tan-vegetal surface, Dupont worked with tarred ropes from Antwerp’s port, which exude a distinctive dockyard tang. Close proximity to Alruin recalls the tarry embrace of a particularly hirsute sailor.

In 1980, Tapta moved away from fibre to create black sculptural works in industrial materials. Abandoning colour must have been a wrench. The subtle, nature-derived tones both of the yarn-wrapped cylinders of Horizon Flexibles (1976) and suspended twisting panels of Structure Torsadée (Twisted Structure, 1973) are prime examples of the tactile and textural depth that fibre can bring. Both works are exciting explorations of form and colour.

Not all the Textielgroep pursued fibrous routes. Hetty Van Boekhout’s padded, embroidered relief The Ratrace (1973), stitched from upholstery textiles, portrays a huddle of fat-cats, caricatured in an illustrational style recalling political children’s fables of the era. Edith Van Driessche’s Use No Hooks (1980-85) is collaged from stained and abraded strips of packaging fabric, the titular phrase repeated like a stuttering refrain down its centre.

s14-img_3001.jpg

Tactile Dialogues: Textile Art from 1970s to Now - 触觉对话:20世纪70年代至今的纺织艺术

Klaas Rommelaere, Time Management, 2018, tapestry. Courtesy: © Gallery Zink

It would be misleading to suggest the Textielgroep were influential antecedents to the younger artists shown suspended, crazily if convincingly, within the eight-storey stairwell. Rommelaere’s epic multi-panel knitted and embroidered Future (2018) uses the visual language of fanzines and folk art in a splintered documentation of the early stages of a relationship, unfolding against a backdrop of empty Jupiler beer cans. It’s an extraordinary piece, but it occupies a different universe from the hand-dyed yarn works of Tapta and Dupont. Kati Heck is more familiar from her meticulous and disarming psychedelic paintings – here one appears half-stretched, slack and flag-like. On the storey above, the artist has positioned a vast upholstered doll with a tumbled head against a magenta curtain: more drama, and as ever with Heck, the suggestion of oddness interrupted.

It is only Sven ‘t Jolle’s Yves Saint-Lazare (2014) – a masklike robe pieced from rags used to moisten clay – that strikes an abject note of a piece with Van Driessche. This is not a criticism, more an acknowledgement of how art-historically concealed the Textielgroep’s work has been. Many of the artists involved are still alive, and it’s striking how much contextual text here comes from new interview material. If published records do exist of the group’s activities, they’re still warmly nestled in paper archives, yet to bother the world online.

‘Soft? Tactile Dialogues’, ModeMuseum and Maurice Verbaet Center, Antwerp, Belgium runs until 24 February 2019.

Main image: Nel Aerts, Ontmaskerd Maske, edition of 20, 2017. Courtesy: © We Document Art

Hettie Judah

Hettie Judah is a writer based in London.

Opinion /

MoMu
Antwerp
Textielgroep
Textiles
Tapestry
Weaving
Hettie Judah
Opinion


在艺术市场纪录片《万物价格》(2018)中,苏富比的艾米·卡佩拉佐(Amy Cappellazzo)建议将公司中庭中的作品定位为职业死亡的单行道。正如拍卖商看到的那样,一旦你在大厅里出现,就没有出去了。那么,在上世纪60年代一个商业街区的入口大厅和楼梯间举办一场雄心勃勃的纺织品展览似乎是一种不可抗拒的明智姿态——一种媒介,在一个不那么欣赏的时代,与大堂艺术同义。s17-christoph-hefti.jpg Tactile Dialogues: Textile Art from 1970s to Now - 触觉对话:20世纪70年代至今的纺织艺术-Christoph Hefti,动物面膜,2016,染色和天然羊毛和丝绸。礼貌:曼尼拉在“软”?《战术对话》是比利时年轻艺术家从事纤维艺术的作品,其中包括尼尔·艾尔特斯、卡蒂·赫克和克拉斯·隆美莱尔,与上世纪70年代联袂的作品一起展出。这是媒体流行的时代。1962年起,国际挂毯双年展在洛桑举行,1969年在纽约现代艺术博物馆举办的“挂墙”展览包括希拉·希克斯和莱诺尔·托尼的作品以及来自美洲和欧洲的27位艺术家。本次展览重新介绍了在那个时代活跃在比利时的(很大程度上是女性)的作品。除了塔普塔(出生于玛丽亚·维尔鲁斯-科沃斯基)的两件作品外,所有的作品都取自安特卫普莫德博物馆的档案,自被收购后不久,这些作品一直未被展出。(在艺术上和服装上都是这种奇特的时尚。)s03-kh_arco2016_02-1.jpg Tactile Dialogues: Textile Art from 1970s to Now - 触觉对话:20世纪70年代至今的纺织艺术 Kati Heck,Dreimal Selbst mit Magier(即使有三个魔术师),2016,帆布上的油、铅笔、墨水和帆布。礼貌:蒂姆·凡·莱尔画廊.任何机构都不可能忽视维尔·杜邦的《阿鲁恩》(曼德雷克,1976年)。除了墙上挂着的相当大的重量和像克拉肯号触须一样长长的根状卷须外,这幅画还散发出持续的香味。在编织成Alruin的褐色植物丛生的表面的许多材料中,杜邦用安特卫普港口的焦油绳子工作,这些绳子散发出独特的船坞气息。靠近Alruin的人回忆起一个特别多毛的水手的迟滞拥抱。1980,Tapta离开了纤维,在工业材料中创造了黑色雕塑作品。放弃颜色一定是个骗局。“水平柔性”(1976)的纱线缠绕圆柱体和“扭转结构”(Twisted.,1973)的悬挂扭转板,这两种微妙的、自然派生的色调都是纤维所能带来的触觉和织构深度的主要例子。这两部作品都是形式和色彩的激动人心的探索。并非所有的TexTielGrEP都追求纤维路线。Hetty Van Boekhout的衬垫、绣花浮雕《费率竞赛》(1973)是用室内装潢纺织品缝制的,描绘了一群肥猫,用插图的方式描绘,回忆起那个时代的政治儿童寓言。伊迪丝·凡·德里舍的《使用无钩》(1980-85)是用染色和磨损的包装织物条拼贴而成的,这个标题性的短语像口吃似的重复着。S14-IMGZ01.1.JPG WPA60260602IMG KLAAS ROMLMEALE,时间管理,2018,TopeStices。礼貌:Zink画廊.如果认为Textielgroep是被悬挂在八层楼梯井内的年轻艺术家的有影响力的前身,那将是误导的。Rommelaere的史诗多面板编织和刺绣未来(2018)使用幻想和民间艺术的视觉语言在一个分裂的文档早期阶段的关系,展开的背景空Ju.r啤酒罐。这是一件非同寻常的作品,但它与Tapta和杜邦的手工染色纱线不同。卡蒂·赫克更熟悉她那幅细致、令人心神不宁的迷幻画——在这幅画中,有一幅显得半伸展、松弛、像旗帜。在上面的楼层上,艺术家把一个巨大的装潢好的娃娃安置在洋红色的窗帘上,娃娃的头朝下摔了一跤:更多的戏剧性,和以前一样,赫克打断了奇怪的暗示。只有斯文·乔尔的《伊夫·圣拉扎尔》(2014年)——一件用抹布拼成的用来润湿粘土的面具状的长袍——和凡·德里斯谢打成一片。这并不是批评,而是对艺术在历史上隐藏了TexTielGrEP作品的承认。许多参与其中的艺术家还活着,令人吃惊的是,这里的上下文文本来自新的采访材料。如果已经公布的记录确实存在该组织的活动,它们仍然被放在纸质档案馆里,仍然困扰着网上的世界。“柔软?触觉对话,MaMeMuSUM和Maurice Verbaet Center,安特卫普,比利时一直持续到2019年2月24日。主要图像:Ontmaskerd Maske,20, 2017版。礼貌:©我们文档艺术赫蒂犹大赫蒂犹大是一个作家在伦敦。意见/嫫母安特卫普textielgroep纺织编织赫蒂犹大意见


FRIZE特稿
ARThing编译



Comments are closed.