2018 was a year marked by flames. From California’s recent wildfires to the extinction of the National Museum in Rio de Janeiro in a devastating fire this past September, this was, to say the least, a gruelling year. I suspect that the Brazilian government’s slovenliness with landmark architecture and historical preservation is not far from Trump’s biased blind eye towards climate change; their actions are the outcome of neglect and greed.
We are now getting our just desserts for decades of neoliberal policies (and die-hard colonial mentalities) that favour profit over preservation and – in Brazil at least – a systematic disdain towards environmental care and cultural heritage. Looking at these recent disasters, one thing is certain: our way of life needs to change in order for our species to remain.
_k6a4735.jpg

‘Memories of Underdevelopment’, 2018, installation view, Museo Jumex, Mexico City. Courtesy: Museo Jumex, Mexico City
Two very different exhibitions held in 2018 brought together generations of artists that have been questioning ‘official discourses’ and Western standards for decades: ‘Memories of Underdevelopment’ curated by Julieta González at Museo Jumex, Mexico City, and ‘Metamorphoses – Let Everything Happen to You’ curated by Chus Martinez at Castello di Rivoli, Turin.
‘Memories of Underdevelopment’ was a massive curatorial effort that brought together around 400 works from artists from eight different countries in Latin America spanning twenty-five years (between the early 1960s and the mid-1980s) that ditched or deliberately refused Western-imposed aesthetics and the dominant rhetoric of developmentalism in the region. The other exhibition at Castello di Rivoli explored the notion of metamorphosis as a process shared by the natural and the creative worlds. Through the works of a fascinating few like Eduardo Navarro and Mathilde Rosier, Martinez’s exhibition embodied today’s most urgent lack: a full-on reconnection with the environment, starting from rethinking language and our own mental structures. These shows were radically different in their curatorial approach and content, but they converged at a crucial point: artists as agents for paradigm shifts.
_k6a8601a.jpg

‘Memories of Underdevelopment’, 2018, installation view, Museo Jumex, Mexico City. Courtesy: Museo Jumex, Mexico City
I’m certain that many of the artists featured by Gonzalez took Chus Martinez’s proposition, ‘Let everything happen to you’, very seriously when radically engaging – politically and physically – with their own contexts and structural issues. They created new methodologies and forms of social commitment from scratch. At a time when the worst kind of politics are infecting the planet and draining our energy with heavy loads of fear and frustration, it would be nice to consider ourselves more like bees (in the curatorial text, Chus Martinez wonders if we could be flowers) who cross-pollinate ideas and experiences in an attempt to find more sensorial – or less rhetorical – ways of dealing with each other and our surroundings.
It was refreshing to see shows that brilliantly tackled a recent but constant puzzle for the art world: how to deal with our global failure when it comes to climate change and endemic social injustice in the art realm. And how this ongoing puzzle can be solved without losing exhibitions’ essential raison d’etre – providing intriguing visual experiences as starting points for broader discussions. I’ll keep these two shows and this dilemma in mind into the new year.
Retrospective thinking is often a melancholic activity, especially after a year like this in Brazil. The victory of the far-right conservative candidate Jair Bolsonaro, concluding a batch of surrealistic events – such as the museum burning and the brutal murder of congresswoman Marielle Franco – made artists and most people working in the arts deeply anxious about current affairs (including myself). The question of whether art is capable of doing something about it has caused some artists to retreat inward, and others to go on the offensive. In São Paulo, Casa do Povo’s programme welcomed artists and activists that opted for the latter. This included a theatrical performance conceived and staged by former secondary-school students who participated in the school occupations against budget cuts by the state in 2015-2016 and the exhibition ‘Rejuvenate!’, conceived by the artist Renata Lucas as an acute response to the aforementioned ‘surrealistic’ political scenery of the country. Lucas worked with Mauro Restiffe, Carla Zaccagnini, Carlos Fajardo and others in a self-organized attempt to raise awareness for the current political situation.
img_1910.jpg

View of supporters of Jair Bolsonara from MASP, São Paulo, 2018. Courtesy: Fernanda Brenner
In the student performance ‘Quando Quebra Queima’ (roughly: when it breaks it burns), young performers took over the community centre’s open rooms in what they called a ‘dance-uproar’. By re-enacting the moments of occupation at their former schools, the youngsters’ bodies disrupted the structure that first brought them together by transforming their discontent into an artistic language. We attend the theatre to watch human bodies perform, but this was nothing like that. These bodies were power lines for social change, they weren’t enacting anything and we weren’t watching. I felt that by simply being there, I was subscribing to something I didn’t fully realize yet, something that is becoming clearer as things get rougher.
A power line can start a fire if it breaks in the wind. The cause of the Californian firestorms was human, as with the incineration of the museum. To build and to burn is the modus-operandi of what we learned to call ‘civilization’, but everything that deeply caught my attention this year seemed to disavow this premise. Sometimes after tragedies happen it’s easy to slip back into daily life as we know it, to forget what a new era may ask of us, even when the stakes are high. These shows encompass both analytic reporting and affective experience, and hasten us to find our own ways to engage with our time’s most pressing issues.
Renata Lucas ‘stabbed’ the three-story building of Casa do Povo with a massive Brazilian flag (Top-floor, 2018), its pole piercing all the building’s slabs. Without the official ‘art institution’ framework, the installation’s structure mingles – or interferes – with all the activities taking place in the space (from boxing lessons to neighbourhood forums). Flags have always been symbols of domination, conceptual disparity and territorial dispute. When reaching the top floor, the Brazilian national symbol dramatically touches the ground, looking exhausted and crestfallen with its own weight. Unfortunately, Lucas’s piece didn’t coexist with the student performance in Casa do Povo, but it might have. Maybe a good way to deal with 2018’s ashes is to ‘sing the body-electric’ along with Brazilian students and follow the lead of Martinez’s group show, to start by decolonizing our own minds.
Main image: A massive fire engulfs the National Museum in Rio de Janeiro, 2018. Courtesy: AFP/Getty Images; photograph: Carl De Souza
Fernanda Brenner is the founder and Artistic Director of Pivô, an independent non-profit art space in São Paulo, and a contributing editor of frieze.
“欠发达的记忆”,2018年,安装视图,墨西哥城尤梅克斯博物馆。礼貌:墨西哥城Jumex博物馆于2018年举办了两次截然不同的展览,汇集了数十年来质疑“官方言论”和西方标准的几代艺术家:Julieta Gonz_lez在墨西哥城Jumex博物馆策划的“欠发达的记忆”和“变形——让ev都灵里沃利城堡的丘斯·马丁内斯策划的《红楼梦》发生在你身上。“不发达的记忆”是一项巨大的策展工作,汇集了拉丁美洲8个不同国家的约400件艺术家的作品,这些艺术家跨越了25年(20世纪60年代初到80年代中期),他们抛弃或故意拒绝西方强加的美学和发展主义的主导论调。这个区域。另一个在里沃利城堡举办的展览探讨了变形的概念,认为变形是自然世界和创造世界共同的过程。通过像爱德华多·纳瓦罗和马蒂尔德·罗西尔这样一些引人入胜的人的作品,马丁内斯的展览体现了当今最紧迫的缺憾:从重新思考语言和我们自己的精神结构开始,与环境的全面联系。这些展览在其策展方法和内容上有着根本的不同,但它们集中在一个关键点上:艺术家作为范式转变的代理人。U K6A8601A.JPG
“欠发达的记忆”,2018年,安装视图,墨西哥城尤梅克斯博物馆。礼貌:墨西哥城的Jumex博物馆,我确信许多冈萨雷斯的艺术家都接受了Chus Martinez的主张,“让一切都发生在你身上”,当他们在政治和身体上与自己的背景和结构问题进行根本性的接触时,这是非常严肃的。他们从头开始创造新的方法论和社会承诺的形式。当最糟糕的政治正在感染这个星球,并以沉重的恐惧和挫折消耗我们的精力时,我们最好把自己看成更像蜜蜂(在策展文本中,丘斯·马丁内斯想知道我们是否可以成为花),他们把思想和经验交叉传播,试图找到更多的感官的,或更少的感觉。修辞——处理彼此和周围环境的方式。让人耳目一新的是,这些展览出色地解决了艺术界最近但始终存在的一个难题:当涉及到气候变化和艺术领域特有的社会不公时,如何应对我们的全球失败。以及如何在不丢失展览的基本理由的情况下解决这个持续存在的难题——提供有趣的视觉体验作为更广泛讨论的起点。回顾性思考通常是一种忧郁的活动,尤其是在巴西这样的一年之后。极右保守党候选人贾尔·布尔索纳罗(Jair Bolsonaro)的胜利结束了一系列超现实主义事件,如烧毁博物馆和残酷谋杀众议员玛丽尔·弗朗哥(Marielle Franco),使艺术家和大多数艺术工作者对时事(包括我本人)深感忧虑。艺术是否有能力对此做些什么的问题已经导致一些艺术家向内退缩,而另一些则继续进攻。在圣保罗,卡萨多波沃的节目欢迎选择后者的艺术家和活动家。这包括一场戏剧表演,由前中学生构思和上演,他们参加了学校职业,反对国家在2015-2016年削减预算,以及展览“复兴”!艺术家雷纳塔·卢卡斯(RenataLucas)认为,这是对上述国家“超现实主义”政治风景的一种强烈反应。卢卡斯与莫罗·里斯特夫、卡拉·扎卡尼尼、卡洛斯·法贾尔多和其他人合作,自组织地努力提高人们对当前政治形势的认识。img_1910.jpg
从masp,s_o paulo的jair bolsonara支持者的观点,2018年。礼貌:费尔南达·布伦纳在学生表演“quando quebra queima”(大致是:当它打破它燃烧时),年轻的表演者接管了社区中心的开放房间,他们称之为“舞蹈骚动”。通过在以前的学校里重演占领的时刻,年轻人的身体打破了最初把他们聚集在一起的结构,把他们的不满变成了一种艺术语言。我们去看戏看人体表演,但这不是那样的。这些机构是社会变革的动力线,他们什么都没有实施,我们也没有看到。我觉得,仅仅是在那里,我就订阅了一些我还没有完全意识到的东西,当事情变得越来越艰难时,这些东西变得越来越清晰。如果电线在风中断裂,它可以引发火灾。加利福尼亚州的火灾是人为的,就像博物馆被焚化一样。建造和燃烧是我们学会称之为“文明”的惯用做法,但今年引起我深刻关注的一切似乎都否认了这一前提。有时,在悲剧发生后,我们很容易回到我们所知道的日常生活中,忘记一个新时代可能会要求我们什么,即使风险很高。这些节目包括分析报告和情感体验,并促使我们找到自己的方式来处理我们这个时代最紧迫的问题。雷纳塔·卢卡斯用一面巨大的巴西国旗“刺穿”了卡萨·多·波沃的三层建筑(顶层,2018年),它的柱子刺穿了所有建筑的石板。如果没有官方的“艺术机构”框架,装置的结构会与空间内发生的所有活动(从拳击课到社区论坛)混合或干扰。旗帜一直是统治、概念差异和领土争端的象征。当到达顶层时,巴西国家标志戏剧性地触地,看上去精疲力竭,带着自己的重量垂头丧气。不幸的是,卢卡斯的作品并没有与学生在卡萨多波沃的表演共存,但它可能存在。也许处理2018年灰烬的一个好方法是与巴西学生一起“唱身体电”,并跟随马丁内斯的小组秀的领导,从非殖民化我们自己的思想开始。主要图片:一场大火吞噬了里约热内卢的国家博物馆,2018年。礼貌:法新社/盖蒂图片社;照片:卡尔·德·苏扎·费尔南达·布伦纳·费尔南达·布伦纳是皮尤的创始人和艺术总监,皮尤·保罗的一个独立的非盈利艺术空间,弗里泽的特约编辑。意见/费尔南达·布伦纳博物馆回顾2018年艺术与政治FRIZE特稿 ARThing编译